From: Leon Leslie ([email protected])
Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 15:53:24 CEST
If that is what it means I prefer that it remain small. The one floppy is
one of the outstanding features..
There is a lot one can do with libc5 and the present Kernel...
small is beautiful.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michele Andreoli" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: customising muLinux
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 09:33:43AM +0200, Sven Conrad nicely wrote:
>
> > . But libc6 remains VERY BIG compared to that > libc5 of
> > mulinux. May be the better way is libc5?
> >
> > /sven
> >
>
> In my scenario, libc is only an engine able support popular interpreters
> in muLinux: they are, of course: sh, m4, awk and (new!) perl.
> My goal is to use sh, m4, awk etc ... libc5, libc4, is not matter.
> Libc5 in muLinux is only 430k; my libc6 is 700k. Putting libc6 on the
> first floppy means to abandon the idea of the single floppy linux at all.
>
> Michele
>
> --
> I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't
> remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET