From: Michele Andreoli ([email protected])
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 12:43:46 CEST
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 09:33:43AM +0200, Sven Conrad nicely wrote:
> . But libc6 remains VERY BIG compared to that > libc5 of
> mulinux. May be the better way is libc5?
>
> /sven
>
In my scenario, libc is only an engine able support popular interpreters
in muLinux: they are, of course: sh, m4, awk and (new!) perl.
My goal is to use sh, m4, awk etc ... libc5, libc4, is not matter.
Libc5 in muLinux is only 430k; my libc6 is 700k. Putting libc6 on the
first floppy means to abandon the idea of the single floppy linux at all.
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET