RE: Bigslack or Zipslack

From: Kautzmann Gerd ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 09:39:03 CET

• Next message: Julian Wieder: "[mu SETUP] on hd"
• Previous message: CH: "Re: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Maybe in reply to: Karim Homsi: "Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Next in thread: Karim Homsi: "RE: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Reply: Karim Homsi: "RE: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

with kind regards / mit freundlichen Grüssen

Gerd Kautzmann

--
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karim Homsi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Bigslack or Zipslack
> 
> 
> Can I build up a network whith Zipslack or do I need
> Bigslack for building up a network whith 2 computers
Just a question for better understanding:
Do you want to have any file server services ( Windows Network, Novel,
Samba, NFS ) ?  
Do you want to use the LINUX computer as a router ?
Or is tcp/ip between 2 computers enough ?
>  --- karte <[email protected]> schrieb: > both slaks run in
> a dos partitions
> > 
> > zipslack is about 40/80 MB and it's very essential
> > 
with kind regards / mit freundlichen Grüssen
Gerd Kautzmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

• Next message: Julian Wieder: "[mu SETUP] on hd"
• Previous message: CH: "Re: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Maybe in reply to: Karim Homsi: "Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Next in thread: Karim Homsi: "RE: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Reply: Karim Homsi: "RE: Bigslack or Zipslack"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:23 CET