Re: An ambitious idea

From: Michele Andreoli ([email protected])
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 15:27:47 CET


On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:42:54AM +0000, José Luis Gómez Dans nicely wrote:
>
> That is probably true, but having a pragmatic approach might be
> useful here. In the case of mulinux/server I see it as "any program that
> can be installed by one person so that many can benefit from it
> remotely".

Perfect definition.

> > The old functionalities, historycal, fake and romantic functionalies,
> > also-known-as "rustic", still remains in the BASE floppy disk,
> > as *memento* about human presumption, but they are shut-down automatically
> > when other addons are loaded.
>
> Romantic? X-))

Oh, from my point of view, they are fall in the "romantic" class, as
every form of hopelesse eroism . To deliver an email with a script is
a full eroism.

Michele

-- 
"I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any.
Would two negative ones do?"			-- Woody Allen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:16 CET