From: Angel Martin Alganza ([email protected])
Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 23:06:36 CET
At 20:02 31/10/99 +0000, Richard Kirkcaldy wrote:
>I get along all right, but I haven't tried Netscape. Once software has
>loaded it is a fairly slow, but I can make do with it. Some software is
>fast once it has loaded, some is slow loading and running.
mmmhhh... I guess I have to go and try the software I need and see whether
or not it performs well enough fotr my purposes. If I simply could find
some docs on how to proceed not to have to do much research on my own...
>Well a LAN isn't going to be any faster than localhost is it? Especially
>if it was a busy network.
I was saying this because you said perhaps the limiting factor was the hard
disk... but anyway, most probably your'e right.
>I have found that win3.11 is faster than mulinux, so I would prefer to use
>that if possible. But I don't know that win3.11 is as good at networking,
>and it certainly isn't as good at security.
I don't think it is. I actually don't think any Windows could even be close
to any Linux system regarding networking, stability and/or security.
Security is not a big concern for those systems, since they are thoughts
just as "terminals" for users; but stability and ease of maintenance is an
important one... that's way I would like to go with Linux.
Cheers,
Angel
-----------------------------------------------------
Angel MARTIN ALGANZA http://www.ugr.es/~ama/
Departamento de Genetica & Instituto de Biotecnologia
Campus de Fuentenueva. Universidad de Granada
E-18071 Granada - Spain Tel +34 958 248 926
mailto:[email protected] ICQ#5334825 Fax +34 958 244 073
-----------------------------------------------------
Unexpected attachments larger than 50Kb > /dev/null
The truth is out there. Does somebody know its URI?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:16 CET