From: Sven Conrad ([email protected])
Date: Sun Aug 27 2000 - 00:18:19 CEST
Michele Andreoli wrote:
>
> Thanks Sven. Only a note: think you plip.o is conflicting with lp.o?
> In this case, I think it is better if the .fun script remove the
> standard parallel port module lp.o, or the port is busy.
>
Yes you are right. plip conflicts with lp. But I use this in
an old mu where lp is not loaded, when it is not configured.
Is there a usfull way to configure printer support and plip
at the same time? Or should we write plip and lp in such a
way that they allways remove the other one, so that setup plip
and setup lp can be used from console to switch between them?
sven
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET