From: Michele Andreoli ([email protected])
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 22:14:43 CEST
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 06:43:59PM +0200, Dumas Patrice nicely wrote:
> Hi Michele, and all,
>
> Here are the files.
> In setup : I added an error checking in process(), and a "virtual"
> function error() that is to be overriden in the .fun.
You are a C++ programmers!
>
> In tmp.fun : added a prepare() section, an unwanted() section, and an
> error checking (that relies on what I put in setup, but I can change).
>
> In netconfig : I put a new switch, -f <file> so that netconfig can use
> another file than /etc/net.conf, so that netconfig can be used to bring
> up or down every interface defined in a file like /etc/net.conf. I did
> it because I want to use netconfig to bring up an interface defined in
> the plip.fun I will write one day. And it also could be used to setup a
> second networking card to use muLinux as a router.
Witty solution.
>
> It is absolutely untested. I will test it, but, only when I have
> time...Throw what you don't want and keep the remainder... if it remains
> something !
>
Mmmm ... no test at all?
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET