From: zhengliangchen ([email protected])
Date: Tue Jul 18 2000 - 02:44:23 CEST
I have recompiled the busybox. I also have found the source of "UMSDOS".
-----Original Message-----
~{7"<~HK~}: Michele Andreoli <[email protected]>
~{JU<~HK~}: [email protected] <[email protected]>
~{HUFZ~}: 2000~{Dj~}7~{TB~}18~{HU~} 0:09
~{VwLb~}: Re: help: about the command "umssync"
>On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 04:34:25PM +0800, zhengliangchen nicely wrote:
>> I can't find the command "umssync" in my redhat linux system.
>> But in the rc.pre-umdos
>> it use the command:
>> "umssync -r99 $TREE"
>>
>> I wonder if the command is self-defined. If it is ,how can I get the
source
>> of it?
>
>Be aware: UMSDOS support is changed in series 2.2.* and, I my opinion,
>now simply do not work. Anycase, surely, the current busybox can't
>work with new kernels.
>
>Michele
>
>
>--
>I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't
>remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET