From: Gerhard Thimm ([email protected])
Date: Thu Jun 22 2000 - 11:25:27 CEST
Jef Knoors schrieb:
>
> Well, you're right about learning to use vi, I should have asked for an
> editor wich would use the same functionkey's I'm already used to. I.o.w
> using an editor _without_ learning the next set of commands. Sinds I use
> DOS/Windoze/Linux ...
>... I don't want to reprogramm my memory, but my computerprogramms.
Well, that's exactly the point!
Sorry, I can not resist to write the following:
The Point why I learnd vi (program my memory a last time). This is one
of my best investments. As it seems you work with PC-based systems which
always have function-keys, why not use it. I never use function-keys,
because a lot of the systems i worked and work have no function-keys
(Terminals, industrial Systems, ...). But in most cases you find a vi
for this systems. And btw, it is great fun to _vi_ a file on a strange
machine you logged in via a palm-organizer :-)
Gerhard
BTW: The vi tutorial KHZ mentions earlier will take you an hour and
after two days you can't believe that you not used vi before.
BTW2: A friend of mine often use this sentence:" Never discuss sex,
religion and editors". And so I fall back to silence.
> Jef
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Karl-Heinz Zimmer <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 10:21 AM
> Subject: vi ? (was: MC -e)
>
> On 22.06.00, 09:39:10, Jef Knoors wrote:
>
> > Does anyone of you know if there's a editor like MC \e
> > with out the filemanager.
> > Just a smal binary to put on my floppy.
> > I searched for hours, but there are so many editors,
> > most of them are either very big or difficult to use.
>
> Yes, there IS such an editor, it's name (I am not kidding) is: vi
>
> Why that???
>
> Didn't you ask for an editor that is _not_ 'difficult to use'.
>
> Ok, at the very first moment one might think that I am kidding
> or trying to start another flame-war but please take the time
> to think about it, maybe this arguments can convince you:
>
> - vi is not intuitive
>
> - therefor many people think it is 'difficult to use'.
>
> Is this true?
> Is it 'difficult to use'?
>
> In my opinion it depends on _if_ you take the time
> to _learn_ using it.
>
> Oh, no, what a stupid argument! ;-)
>
> Sure?
>
> So what about the fact that a dear muLinux user made a VERY good
> tutorial that teaches you how to use the vi step by step?
>
> If one takes the time to do this (indeed not very long) course
> she or he will notice that
>
> a) LEARNING the vi with this course is EASY
>
> b) USING the vi when having finished the course is EASY
>
> So where IS the great tutorial?
>
> As mentioned of the muLinux homepage (see 'WEB PAGES') the
>
> VI MU-MAN
> is here: uk http://www.navigare.org/vi-muman.uk
> it http://www.navigare.org/vi-muman.it
> de http://www.navigare.org/vi-muman.de
>
> Have a lot of Fun! :)
>
> Karl-Heinz
> --
>
> "Why do we have to hide from the police, Daddy?" Dave Fischer
> "Because we use vi, son. They use emacs." 1995/06/19
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET