From: Csillag Tamás ([email protected])
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 16:30:15 CEST
Hello
I think you're using Mulinux with umsdos partition.
Once I used MuLinux on umsdos partition and I've got a same problem.
After it I begin to use on e2fs partition I haven't got the problem.
So try using Mulinux on e2fs partition if you don't using that yet.
Oh I'm sorry I read your letter again and yes you are using UMSDOS that's
the problem.
Michele!
Please try Mu with umsdos I think it's a bug which only make error under
umsdos.
Bye!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Csillag Tamás
mailto:[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Eredeti üzenet-----
Feladó: "Jef Knoors" <[email protected]>
Címzett: <[email protected]>
Elküldve: 2000. május 11. 8:54
Tárgy: Re: mu script ver. 7r12b
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michele Andreoli <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: mu script ver. 7r12b
>
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 03:23:24PM +0200, Jef Knoors nicely wrote:
> > > Some additional information:
> > >
> > > BOOT = 848 ROOT = 545 USR = 576 TOTAL = 1961 -239 free
> > >
> > > seems that BOOT filesize is too large.
> >
> > This is my "free" file (9r1):
> >
> > ==========================================
> > BOOT=600, ROOT=550, USR=576, Total 1722
> > 0 k-bytes (uncompressed) free.
> > ==========================================
> >
> > Your BOOT is enourmous: it is in tree/startup. Did you changed
> > kernel?
> I did not change a thing, just unpack and rebuild with the script.
> du -k -s startup
> returns: 800
> so thats normal.
> Or did I have to deleted the old kernel?
> > Sorry: I checked. I've no problem with "mu -u; mu -r"
> >
> > > While building the script reports: BOOT.raw 593/840 blocks
> > > So somewhere I need to change a parameter.
> >
> > When I rebuild 9r1, I see:
> >
> > ====================================================
> > e2fsck 1.10, 24-Apr-97 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> > BOOT.raw: clean, 33/152 files, 585/596 blocks
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Do you are using some new e2fsprog release? If we got definitely
> > problems with installed program, I've to parametrize the "Mu"
> > script in the way it can use own program, from tree/.
> > This happens with lilo and fdformat yet, for example.
> I use the UMSDOS version wich I cloned from the same disk (7r12b)
> Did only change the smb configuration.
>
>
> >
> > Michele
> > --
> > I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't
> > remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET