From: Michele Andreoli ([email protected])
Date: Sat Apr 29 2000 - 13:44:22 CEST
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 06:19:54PM -0400, Alfie Costa nicely wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2000, at 22:38, Michele Andreoli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > 1) I don't know how to get 'gcc' to compile things small. With no
> > > switches, 'gcc' produces a 6K 'hexd' for the original version, yet mu's
> > > 'hexd' is only 3.6K. So the compiled version is not included.
> >
> > Did you stripped the result object?
>
> No, maybe it's now time for me to read the gcc manual. On this topic, is it
> better to send C programs as(?):
>
> 1) Source code only, because it's smallest, and ensures no virii.
> 2) Source and object code, to save labor.
>
But, I already compiled the new hexd and it is now in muLinux. I strip
with:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6217 Apr 29 11:43 hexd
# strip hexd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4408 Apr 29 11:43 hexd
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET