Re: [mu TECH] lpr tweak / bug(?)

From: Michele Andreoli ([email protected])
Date: Thu Apr 06 2000 - 08:54:18 CEST

• Next message: Michele Andreoli: "Re: [mu TECH] ppp-on tweak"
• Previous message: Bob Goodwin: "Re: muLinux and LinuxJournal"
• In reply to: Alfie Costa: "[mu TECH] lpr tweak / bug(?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 01:04:58AM -0400, Alfie Costa nicely wrote:
>
> I think the 2nd 'exec' will prevent 'echo "done."' from ever running.
> Are the 'exec' statements there to save memory?
>

Yes, it is. It save us from fork() ( but God doesn't).

Michele

-- 
I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't 
remember any. Would two negative ones do?       -- Woody Allen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

• Next message: Michele Andreoli: "Re: [mu TECH] ppp-on tweak"
• Previous message: Bob Goodwin: "Re: muLinux and LinuxJournal"
• In reply to: Alfie Costa: "[mu TECH] lpr tweak / bug(?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:13 CET